Longmont, state should compromise on fracking
Longmont recently implemented several measures to control the effects of fracking, whereby treated water is injected into the ground to fracture shale, thereby releasing fossil fuels. The practice is being implemented across the country, with the Niobrara formation in Colorado and Wyoming a hotspot for fracking activity.
Communities such as Longmont are concerned about the environmental and health effects of fracking. As reporter Michael Davidson noted in a recent article, Longmont’s measures have included excluding drilling in residential areas and requiring companies to use directional drilling.
The state attorney general’s office filed suit against Longmont July 30, arguing that some of the measures conflict with the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission’s power to regulate the industry.
Both sides have valid arguments. The oil-and-gas industry seeks to avoid a patchwork of environmental regulations across the state that would make compliance difficult, and the state seeks to preserve its authority to regulate the sector.
On the other hand, communities such as Longmont are closest to the effects of fracking and deserve more say in how the practice occurs within municipal boundaries. Gov. John Hickenlooper has expressed a desire to see a compromise in the dispute, and we hope his appeal bears fruit.
There should be a balance between a state agency’s powers and local governments’ desire to protect their citizens. Let’s find that balance and get this out of the courts.
More breaking news...
Congress must review rules to ease banks’ burden
One of the hottest emerging industry sectors in the Boulder Valley and Northern Colorado is drone technology. At least half a dozen young companies are experimenting with manufacturing
It's time for voters to embrace plans for bus rapid transit
Known officially as the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the law is beginning to weigh on the shoulders of the financial sector, creating huge