Longmont, state should compromise on fracking
Longmont recently implemented several measures to control the effects of fracking, whereby treated water is injected into the ground to fracture shale, thereby releasing fossil fuels. The practice is being implemented across the country, with the Niobrara formation in Colorado and Wyoming a hotspot for fracking activity.
Communities such as Longmont are concerned about the environmental and health effects of fracking. As reporter Michael Davidson noted in a recent article, Longmont’s measures have included excluding drilling in residential areas and requiring companies to use directional drilling.
The state attorney general’s office filed suit against Longmont July 30, arguing that some of the measures conflict with the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission’s power to regulate the industry.
Both sides have valid arguments. The oil-and-gas industry seeks to avoid a patchwork of environmental regulations across the state that would make compliance difficult, and the state seeks to preserve its authority to regulate the sector.
On the other hand, communities such as Longmont are closest to the effects of fracking and deserve more say in how the practice occurs within municipal boundaries. Gov. John Hickenlooper has expressed a desire to see a compromise in the dispute, and we hope his appeal bears fruit.
There should be a balance between a state agency’s powers and local governments’ desire to protect their citizens. Let’s find that balance and get this out of the courts.
More breaking news...
Boulder-Xcel tiff may call for 2nd vote
That’s the message that U.S. Sen. Michael Bennet, D-Colo., has delivered to the Office of Management and Budget after the OMB decided to sequester $150 million in fees from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
Hick: Sign bill on rural renewables
That’s how we would describe the visceral reaction to the Colorado General Assembly’s passage of new renewable-energy mandates for rural electricity providers.
Senate Bill 252, which passed