Eminent domain oil pipeline bill fails in Colorado House
Last Updated: 17:24 April 4, 2014
Electric and gas utilities have the authority to declare eminent domain for wires and pipelines, but oil companies do not have that power, according to a ruling by the Colorado Supreme Court in Larson v. Sinclair Transportation Co. in 2012.
Renfroe said he sought the same treatment for oil companies as utilities.
"A pipeline company does not just mean an electric pipeline company," Renfroe said. "It should mean a petroleum pipeline company."
The bill faced stiff opposition from the Weld County Board of Commissioners, which released a statement Friday applauding the bill's failure. The measure had bipartisan co-sponsorship, including from Cheri Jahn, D-Sterling, Mary Hodge, D-Brighton, and Lois Tochtrop, D-Thornton.
Weld Commissioner Barbara Kirkmeyer testified against the bill during House and Senate committee hearings.
"We challenged the constitutionality of this bill from the beginning," Kirkmeyer said in the statement. "The government, including the General Assembly, does not have the authority to give public right-of-way to a private company, nor should they take private property and give it to private companies."
The House voted Tuesday to lay over the bill until May after the measure had passed the state Senate last month.
More breaking news...
Boulder Brands to discuss 2Q earnings Aug. 7
Colo. State Forest Service wins wood-energy grant
The webcast will begin at 7:30 a.m. Mountain Time and will be a listen-only format.
Regional unemployment rates outperform state
The grant will be used to establish wood-energy
Broomfield County saw its